Curse

mystical nessAL · Jan 02, 2008, 02:28 PM // 14:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tender Wolf

Think it's been suggested before but I'll /sign it. I didn't start playing the game until a few months before Nightfall was released, so I'm not sure if this title existed yet, but I'd still like to try it.

Please, check the date.

dts720666 · Jan 02, 2008, 10:21 PM // 22:21

how about a "reset" to lvl 0 for lvl 20 characters that want to try it? That way, we can still get the title, but don't have to delete a primary character or start a new meaningless character just to get the title.

Mr. Diggles · Jan 03, 2008, 05:19 PM // 17:19

/signed
I like having my old character and would hate to reset her. Plus, I would miss out on BDay gifts.

Master Knightfall · Jan 03, 2008, 09:27 PM // 21:27

/unsigned. It's called SURVIVOR Title for a reason you HAVE to SURVIVE you don't get to die and then continue on from your level when you die. YOU START OVER IGMO. Plus allowing it accross your ACCOUNT hahahahah what an IGMO that's the most rediculous suggestion for this title I've ever read hahahahah lololololololol. It's a SURVIVOR TITLE not my like noob level 1 got a title he/she didn't earn....lol Sorry ain't gonna happen bud it's set in stone how the Survivor Title works. Live with it or don't play it just as simple as that.

Tyla · Jan 03, 2008, 09:32 PM // 21:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Master Knightfall

It's called SURVIVOR Title for a reason you HAVE to SURVIVE you don't get to die and then continue on from your level when you die.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Chippo

I have been playing the same char on guild wars since just before it origionally came out.

Survivor title was introduced a bit later, knightfall.

Quote:

YOU START OVER IGMO.

And he has said that he earned alot on his character, such as FoW armour and titles. Please read the OP.

Either way, /notsigned.
Leave the title the way it is and go into Here.

Isileth · Jan 04, 2008, 07:19 AM // 07:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Master Knightfall

/unsigned. It's called SURVIVOR Title for a reason you HAVE to SURVIVE you don't get to die and then continue on from your level when you die. YOU START OVER IGMO. Plus allowing it accross your ACCOUNT hahahahah what an IGMO that's the most rediculous suggestion for this title I've ever read hahahahah lololololololol. It's a SURVIVOR TITLE not my like noob level 1 got a title he/she didn't earn....lol Sorry ain't gonna happen bud it's set in stone how the Survivor Title works. Live with it or don't play it just as simple as that.

Well first off there are chars that have been around since the start of the game (anytime before the title is still a problem however). These are chars who have a lot of time invested into them, players generally shouldnt have to delete them to have a shot at a title.

As for making it account based, who achieved the title? Did that char go out and do it all on their own?

Of course not, titles reward the player. As long as the player has achieved it on one char why not be able to show it on another?
Whats the problem with a level 1 having the title? There is no advantage gained from it. It just shows that the player has achieved it.

fir · Jan 04, 2008, 09:28 AM // 09:28

Well I also think its unfait for the people who missed there change for getting survivior title but dont reset the deaths but give them another title like: Old skool or something like that xD

Fitz Rinley · Jan 04, 2008, 06:21 PM // 18:21

/signed

I agree with allowing a player to qualify from last death, on an xp acrued set up.

Loviatar · Jan 04, 2008, 10:16 PM // 22:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fitz Rinley

/signed

I agree with allowing a player to qualify from last death, on an xp acrued set up.

forget it as that is not a survivor but a farmer.

if you are so desparate ask for a new title track based on total experience points and forget deaths period.

raw experience point total for the win going to insane totals with 10+ levels to it

Isileth · Jan 05, 2008, 10:37 AM // 10:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loviatar

forget it as that is not a survivor but a farmer.

if you are so desparate ask for a new title track based on total experience points and forget deaths period.

raw experience point total for the win going to insane totals with 10+ levels to it

That would be a pure farming title.

At least with survivor you have a choice if you want to play the game "normally" and try and achieve it.

If I was given the chance to get it on my old char I wouldnt change how I played. Farming to me is boring so thats really the main reason, but secondly the title is there for me. Im not getting it so others look and go "wow he must be so cool", therefore if I get it without a challenge it means nothing to me.

A pure farming title based on xp alone is a whole different thing.

MithranArkanere · Jan 05, 2008, 04:55 PM // 16:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loviatar

forget it as that is not a survivor but a farmer.

Then ALL survivors are farmers.

You can't see me · Jan 05, 2008, 07:49 PM // 19:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Isileth

Actually its a very hard title when you cant even try it because you "failed" before it was even introduced!

That's why new character slots are available.

/Not signed. I want a chance at LoDA again, but I can't go back to pre, and there's no reason I should be able to. The same goes for legendary survivor. Think of how easy it would be to earn Rank 1 and 2 for old characters. The fact that your character now has access to all areas of the game greatly reduces the difficulty of the title, which, in my opinion, is not needed at all.

On top of that, this has been suggested 1000 times.

Isileth · Jan 05, 2008, 08:14 PM // 20:14

Have you skipped the whole of the thread You can't see me?

The point is people shouldnt have to delete a char or start a new one.

We also pointed out its not easier on an old char.
You can get runs to max armor, you can use elite tomes to get any build, you have access to all the rewards from missions and quests, you can get run to most of the farming places and with GW:EN access at lvl 10 with a farming point right at the start there is 0 risk.

- Tain - · Jan 05, 2008, 09:51 PM // 21:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Isileth

Have you skipped the whole of the thread You can't see me?

The point is people shouldnt have to delete a char or start a new one.

We also pointed out its not easier on an old char.
You can get runs to max armor, you can use elite tomes to get any build, you have access to all the rewards from missions and quests, you can get run to most of the farming places and with GW:EN access at lvl 10 with a farming point right at the start there is 0 risk.

People SHOULD have to start a new char, or it would be even lamer title than it is now. If you really care about title grind, then you know that you want titles... before grinding out all the others, think about it - if you want max titles, then you know that you want Survivor, so make a new char. If you're that stuck on your old char for whatever reason, there are still plenty of other titles you can max. You don't need Survivor to get GWAMM. Whining because you're lazy isn't going to get you anywhere.

Isileth · Jan 05, 2008, 10:43 PM // 22:43

Im sorry Tain but dont think to know me based on 1 post.

I do not want to max all the titles. Thats not what im here for.
Its also not lazy. I can go and get the title on a new char, but I cant get it for my old char.

The time invested into my old char I would never have the time to put in again.
This change does not make the title easier to get, it just makes it more accessible.

Master Knightfall · Jan 05, 2008, 11:06 PM // 23:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Isileth

Well first off there are chars that have been around since the start of the game (anytime before the title is still a problem however). These are chars who have a lot of time invested into them, players generally shouldnt have to delete them to have a shot at a title.

As for making it account based, who achieved the title? Did that char go out and do it all on their own?

Of course not, titles reward the player. As long as the player has achieved it on one char why not be able to show it on another?
Whats the problem with a level 1 having the title? There is no advantage gained from it. It just shows that the player has achieved it.

Well one of the problems of a level 1 showing that title is that level 1 DIDN"T GET THE TITLE IGMO. That CLASS of character didn't get the title. You might be a survivor as a warrior and this is an enchanter character, you shouldn't have the title on a chanter if you didn't survive as a chanter! Get it now IGMO? Hope so, because those of you wanting it on level ones who haven't done the quest for those classes are pretty rediculous and total IGMO's.

You can't see me · Jan 05, 2008, 11:35 PM // 23:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Isileth

Have you skipped the whole of the thread You can't see me?

The point is people shouldnt have to delete a char or start a new one.

We also pointed out its not easier on an old char.
You can get runs to max armor, you can use elite tomes to get any build, you have access to all the rewards from missions and quests, you can get run to most of the farming places and with GW:EN access at lvl 10 with a farming point right at the start there is 0 risk.

No, I didn't skip the thread. I disagree with it, and do not agree with the arguments for it. Fair enough?

Isileth · Jan 06, 2008, 01:15 PM // 13:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Master Knightfall

Well one of the problems of a level 1 showing that title is that level 1 DIDN"T GET THE TITLE IGMO. That CLASS of character didn't get the title. You might be a survivor as a warrior and this is an enchanter character, you shouldn't have the title on a chanter if you didn't survive as a chanter! Get it now IGMO? Hope so, because those of you wanting it on level ones who haven't done the quest for those classes are pretty rediculous and total IGMO's.

Ok first of there is no need to be offensive, feel free to disagree with the post but leave attacks on the person out.

The same could be said for a PvP title, you could only every play warrior yet when you switch to a monk it still shows.

Why does it do that? Because the player has achieved it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by You Can't See me

No, I didn't skip the thread. I disagree with it, and do not agree with the arguments for it. Fair enough?

Completely fair.

Its just easier if you point out you dont agree with the arguments against the argument than repeat an argument that has already been mentioned. Avoids going round in circles

echX · Jan 29, 2008, 02:38 PM // 14:38

One time death reset is not a good solution... How long would it take to reach 1.337.500 xp in say hard mode at lvl20? Not long...

Make it a account based title...? Perhaps. Just complete it with ONE carachter nad violá! Soundslike the easiest idea right now...

Sry if someone allready has mentioned this, don't have the time to read through the whole thread, liked the topic though :P

RotteN · Jan 29, 2008, 02:44 PM // 14:44

if you don't want lvl1's to be running around with Legendary Survivor, than simply make it only displayable on lvl20 characters ... The title "unlocks itself" for that character once you reach level 20 (if you have already achieved LS on another character).